# Principles — Book-the-Call flavor

**Base:** `templates/principles.md` (all 7 sections + examples apply). This file is the **motion
overlay** for high-ticket agents where the **booked call is the conversion** — the DM only qualifies
and books, and the link is rarely or never dropped in chat.

**Use when:** high-ticket offers ($1000+), long sales cycles, a sales/admissions call (or the
creator) closes. Covers the pixel archetypes **FIN-HIGH-NODMPITCH**, **COACH-BIZ-LONGNURTURE**, and
**COACH-PERSONAL-HIGHQUAL**.
**Representative agents:** mentor.mitch, marketingenioso, jolepalomino, sebariera, a.single.guy.
**Fit for volume:** 200–5000.

---

## The motion

The DM is **qualification**, not closing. 71–73% of winners **never get a link in the DM** — the
call IS the close. Heavy qualification (6–10 inbound), long calendar nurture (14–31 day spans),
multiple sessions. Extended flows dominate. Booking-link friction matters more than anywhere else,
because the booking *is* the conversion event.

## What changes vs base principles

- **Flow** — qualify deeply, then **transition to a booked call** instead of pitching the offer in
  DM: greet → qualify (multi-turn) → permission-to-pitch → propose the call → confirm booking →
  re-engage. The offer/price/link conversation happens on the call.
- **Link/booking policy** — **do not** drop the sales/offer link in DM. The only link is the
  calendar. DM-pitch rate > 40% is a failure mode (closing in DM when it should hand to the call).
- **Qualification depth** — 6–10 inbound before the ask; the most-gated motion in the matrix.
- **Calibration / cadence** — an **8-touch sequence over 14–21 days**; wire a **re-engagement opener**
  (multiple sessions across weeks = many re-openings). Audit booking-link friction (Fogg Ability).

## Rapport dial — pick one per creator

This flavor spans two rapport styles that share the call-closes motion but differ in how they build trust:

- **Challenger / insight-led** *(finance, B2B coaching — mentor.mitch, marketingenioso)*
  - Commercial insight + reframe + commitment question. The "statement" half of each turn IS the insight.
  - Techniques: §2.4 Challenger (insights in `knowledge_base.md`), SPIN Implication, Voss labeling for skeptics.
  - **Target:** `pct_statement_then_question` ≥ **60%** (the highest bar in the matrix; mitch hits 71%).
- **Mirror / labeling-led** *(personal coaching — sebariera, a.single.guy)*
  - Rapport via **reflection**, not pain. Low dolor elicitation (S1 ~15%), high mirroring (S4 ~77%).
  - Techniques: §3.3 Voss labeling (in the statement bubble), §4.2 permission-to-pitch, §4.6
    disqualification-with-value (10 qualifying turns means many leads disqualify).
  - **Target:** `pct_statement_then_question` ≥ **45%**.

## Do NOT use

- Aggressive DM link drops or video-resource motions (S2 is low here; the call carries the offer).
- Single-session close framing — this is a multi-week nurture.
- Pain-heavy openers in the **mirror** dial (S1 > 40% dolor breaks the reflection-led motion).

## Target metrics

- `q_per_turn` ∈ **[0.55, 0.95]** (per dial)
- `pct_statement_then_question` ≥ **45%** (mirror) … ≥ **60%** (challenger)
- `pct_link_NEVER_in_dm` **high** (71–73% in winners)  ·  `median_bubbles_per_outbound_turn` ~ **2.2–2.4**

## Warning signs

- DM pitch rate > 40% → closing in DM instead of handing to the call.
- `span_days` < 7 → cutting the nurture too short.
- `pct_statement_then_question` below the dial floor → losing the insight/mirror structure.
